Keir Starmer was last night under pressure to come clean about the bill for his controversial Brexit ‘surrender’.
The Prime Minister repeatedly ducked questions in Parliament about how much Britain will pay the EU for his deal amid speculation it will run to hundreds of millions of pounds a year.
During clashes in the Commons, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said Sir Keir had not said ‘a single word… about the money that we will now be sending to Brussels’.
While Tory MP Dame Harriett Baldwin said it was time for the PM to set out ‘how much UK taxpayers’ money is he willing to hand over to the EU in order to sign up to its protectionist demands’.
Sir Keir admitted that the deal will involve the UK making a ‘proportionate contribution’ to the EU but refused to say how much it would be.
Tory grandee Sir Bernard Jenkin said the PM was ‘submitting to EU regulations without any control and starting to pay money back to the European Union – he is giving up control over our laws and restoring payments to the European Union’. He predicted Labour would ‘pay a bitter political price for this betrayal’.
The PM, however, insisted his deal would be ‘good for our country and good for the economy’.
Downing Street denied the PM had signed a blank cheque to the EU but said the implementation of parts of the deal is still being negotiated.
The Prime Minister repeatedly ducked questions in Parliament about how much Britain will pay the EU for his deal amid speculation it will run to hundreds of millions of pounds a year
During clashes in the Commons, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said Sir Keir had not said ‘a single word… about the money that we will now be sending to Brussels’
The agreement, announced on Monday, commits the UK to rejoining the EU’s Erasmus+ scheme for young people. The cost of this has previously been estimated at more than £200million.
But the UK must also make an ‘appropriate financial contribution’ to help with the EU’s costs in monitoring Britain’s compliance with the bloc’s rules in areas like food and farming standards.
Britain will also have to pay for its firms to access the EU’s new £125billion defence procurement programme.
But Sir Keir insisted that Britain will not be ‘paying into the EU budget in the way that
EU members do’, with payments instead tied directly to benefits.
No 10 said the financial cost of the deal would be dwarfed by the benefits, which it estimates will add £9billion to the economy by 2040. The PM was also boosted by an intervention from Morrisons’ chief executive Rami Baitieh, who said the deal would ‘ease a source of pressure on food prices’.
In the Commons, Eurosceptic MPs condemned the deal.
Mrs Badenoch said the deal was ‘bad for bills; it is bad for jobs; and it is bad for borders’.
She condemned the decision to extend EU fishing access to British waters for another 12 years as a ‘sellout’. And she said the decision to permanently align with the EU’s rules in areas like agriculture was a ‘total capitulation’, adding: ‘The Prime Minister is going to pay the EU to abide by laws that we have no say on.’ Tory MP Mark Francois said: ‘The British people voted peacefully and democratically to leave the European Union, so why has the Prime Minister surrendered that right and made us a rule-taker from the EU once again?’
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer (L) and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen (R) leave after holding a press conference following the UK-EU summit at the Lancaster House in London, Britain, 19 May 2025
Sir Keir described the warning as ‘nonsense’ and insisted that the UK ‘will have a role in shaping any future rules’. He said the deal was just a ‘first step’, adding that Labour hoped to ‘take our co-operation and co-ordination further, step by step.’
But he appeared to rule out rejoining the EU’s customs union, saying that would cut across other recent trade deals with India and the US, adding: ‘I am not prepared to rip up the benefits that we have negotiated in those deals’.
In Brussels, EU diplomats celebrated, with one telling the BBC: ‘The deal is balanced – arguably with favourable terms for the EU – and simply shows that splendid isolation is not an option in today’s climate.’
The deal has provoked a furious backlash from the fishing industry, with senior figures describing it as a ‘horror show’.
But Environment Secretary Steve Reed claimed it was a ‘reasonably good deal’ for the sector.
He said ministers had resisted pressure from Brussels to allow even more access for EU trawlers and that the deal should spell the end of the bloc’s ban on British shellfish.
