On a South Carolina island, could local control help preserve Gullah heritage?

Like many who moved to this remote island on the southeastern U.S. coast, Mike Hubbard, a retired Virginia farmer, has had to reconsider what constitutes “normal” life.

There is no bridge to the mainland. No grocery store. No post office.

But those are minor inconveniences, he says, compared with what he and others deem a bigger problem: The Beaufort County Board of Commissioners, which collects taxes and dictates island services, begins its monthly meetings on the mainland too late for Daufuskie residents to attend. The group convenes after the last county-funded ferry to the island has departed.

Why We Wrote This

Debating forms of government on a remote island is not just about local self-rule. It’s also about managing gentrification and respecting local input in a place where culture and history matter.

Looking to resolve long-standing concerns about the treatment of islanders by a faraway government, Mr. Hubbard is now an advocate for change in Daufuskie – a jewel in the necklace of Lowcountry island communities shaped by descendants of enslaved people. He wants it to become an independent town.

“Incorporation isn’t to get away from Beaufort County as much as it is to determine our own destiny,” says Mr. Hubbard, who serves on the advisory Daufuskie Island Council. With no easy way to attend meetings, he adds, “it’s hard for us to participate in the political process.”

But the question of how to thoughtfully transform a historic island into a functioning town is not just about the self-determination of small places. It is also increasingly about fighting gentrification and trying to maintain control in the face of mounting pressure from developers to bulldoze traditional bungalows to make way for retiree condos for those migrating from colder climates. (South Carolina had a nearly 11% population increase between 2010 and 2020).

Source link

Related Posts

Load More Posts Loading...No More Posts.