Leftist Katie Couric Goes to Bat for Discredited Study That Painted Republicans as Dangerous, Claims Most Domestic Extremists are Conservative

Katie Couric, a longtime member of the establishment media, is facing criticism for using a discredited Cato Institute study to assert that most domestic terrorists are conservative right-wingers.

Previously a supposed journalist for CNN, NBC News, CBS News, and ABC News, Couric on Thursday published a post to the social media platform X complaining about the Department of Justice.

“Why would the US Justice Department remove a study from its website last week that concluded that far-right extremists have killed far more Americans than any other domestic terror group?” she wrote.

Included with the post was a graph from the Cato Institute study showing that there have been more right-wing politically motivated murders since 1975 than left-wing politically motivated murders.

“This study, based on research spanning three decades, represented one of the most comprehensive government assessments ever of domestic terrorism patterns,” Couric wrote in her post.

“It found that ‘militant, nationalistic, white supremacist violent extremism has increased in the United States’ and that ‘the number of far-right attacks continues to outpace all other types of terrorism and domestic violent extremism,’” she added.

As previously documented, the problems with the Cato Institute study are numerous.

Was Katie Couric ever truly a journalist?

Not only does it not count all the acts of violence that erupted during the violent Black Lives Matter and Antifa riots of 2020, but it even excludes the Sept. 11 terror attack.

The study also misclassifies some domestic terror attacks as right-wing when the evidence suggests they weren’t politically motivated, according to PJ Media author and columnist Matt Margolis.

Consider, for instance, the Oklahoma City bombing.

Related:

Pastor and Wife Who Scammed Christians with Cryptocurrency Ordered to Pay Massive Sum

“As I suspected, [the study] categorized Timothy McVeigh’s ideology as ‘right-wing,’ but this classification is debatable,” Margolis wrote recently for PJ Media.

“McVeigh was an anti-government extremist whose rage stemmed from anger over the 1993 Waco siege and the 1992 Ruby Ridge standoff, not from conservative ideology,” he added.

McVeigh was also reportedly a pro-abortion agnostic.

According to Amber Duke of the Daily Caller, the Cato Institute study only “counts killings, so we miss highly notable political violence like the two assassination attempts on Trump, the 2017 Republican baseball shooting, the attempted stabbing of Lee Zeldin, a neighbor attacking Sen. Rand Paul, the attempted assassination of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, a bomb planted under a Fox News van that failed to detonate, and others.”

Responding to Couric’s post, critics assailed her for propagating what they charged was a “bulls**t” narrative.

Critics also argued that the Cato Institute study’s author, Alex Nowrasteh, is either delusional or an outright left-winger.

In an X post published on Friday, Nowrasteh accused right-wingers of denying “that their terrorists even exist while left-wingers are kind of embarrassed, admit it, and move on.”

Critics pointed out that it was the left that spent days denying that Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk was assassinated by an alleged left-winger.

Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.



Source link

Related Posts

Load More Posts Loading...No More Posts.