Lucy Connolly has accused Sir Keir Starmer of holding her as a political prisoner as she told of her 377-day ordeal for the first time.
Ms Connolly, 42, who was jailed for a ‘racist’ tweet last year, also revealed she is planning to take legal action against the police.
The childminder from Northampton added she would be meeting with Trump officials over what she sees as a ‘free speech crackdown’ in the UK.
Ms Connolly told The Telegraph: ‘I do think the police were dishonest in what they released and what they said about me, and I will be holding them to account for that.’
She said her words were ‘massively twisted’ in a statement released by the Crown Prosecution Service, which suggested she told officers in her police interview she did not like immigrants.
And when asked if she sees herself as ‘Sir Keir Starmer’s political prisoner’, Ms Connolly replied: ‘Absolutely. Me and several other people.’
She added: ‘I think with Starmer he needs to practice what he preaches.’
‘He’s a human rights lawyer, so maybe he needs to look at what people’s human rights are; what freedom of speech means; and what the laws are in this country.’
Lucy Connolly has accused Sir Keir Starmer of holding her as a political prisoner as she told of her 377-day ordeal for the first time. She is pictured giving the interview to The Telegraph
These were the first pictures of Lucy Connolly following her release from prison yesterday
Lucy Connolly (pictured) walked free from prison after being jailed for writing a racist tweet during last summer’s riots
Ms Connolly, who is the wife of Tory councillor Ray Connolly, spent more than a year behind bars for making an inflammatory post on X in the wake of the Southport attacks in July last year.
She pleaded guilty to a charge of inciting racial hatred and was handed a 31-month sentence in October, having been held on remand following her arrest last August.
The post, which she later deleted, said: ‘Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the b******* for all I care… if that makes me racist so be it.’
She had been serving time at HMP Peterborough and had an application to have her sentence reduced rejected in May.
However, she was freed from prison yesterday after serving 40 per cent of her 31-month sentence.
Ms Connolly will remain on licence until her full jail term is up.
Speaking for the first time publicly since her release, she also told Dan Wootton on his YouTube show: ‘I should never have said what I said. It was wrong.
‘But I am no far-right activist. I’m no far-right thug.’
She added: ‘You’re shutting people’s voices down. It’s ‘let’s give them a label’. Let’s tell them they’re bad people and then they will be quiet.’
The mother and former childminder (pictured) had spent more than nine months behind bars after admitting making the inflammatory post on X in July last year
Connolly was taken away from HMP Peterborough in a taxi (pictured) after being released
The Tory councillor was seen watering flowers in preparation for his wife’s release from prison yesterday
Riot police hold back protesters near a burning police vehicle after disorder breaks out in Southport on July 30, 2024
Mr Connolly told the Daily Mail yesterday morning: ‘It will be good to have her home!’
The local Tory councillor, who was busy watering hanging baskets in the couple’s front garden to ensure that her homecoming was picture perfect, said their family’s focus from now would be ‘to get our lives back on track.’
He said that both he and Lucy had coped with her imprisonment ‘relatively well’.
But he added: ‘The only person who hasn’t is our 12-year-old daughter. She has found it very difficult not having her mum at home.
‘So well done Keir Starmer for making it so difficult for a 12–year-old girl. Let’s give him a pat on the back.’
Yesterday Kemi Badenoch, Leader of the Opposition, questioned the public interest in punishing her so harshly.
In a post on X, she wrote: ‘Lucy Connolly finally returns home to her family today. At last. Her punishment was harsher than the sentences handed down for bricks thrown at police or actual rioting.
‘At that time, after Southport, Keir Starmer branded all protesters ‘far-right’ and called for ‘fast-track prosecutions’.
‘Days later, Lucy was charged with stirring up racial hatred – an offence that doesn’t even require intent to incite violence. Why exactly did the Attorney General think that was in the public interest?
‘Meanwhile, former Labour councillor Ricky Jones called for protestors to have their throats slit. Charged with encouraging violent disorder, he pleaded not guilty and was acquitted by a jury who saw his words as a disgusting remark made in the heat of the moment, not a call to action.
‘Juries are a cornerstone of justice, but we shouldn’t have to rely on them to protect basic freedoms. Protecting people from words should not be given greater weight in law than public safety.
Ray Connolly (centre) with supporters outside the Court of Appeal at the Royal Courts of Justice in central London in May
Serious violence and rioting by demonstrators broke out on the streets in Southport on July 30, 2024
‘If the law does this, then the law itself is broken – and it’s time Parliament looked again at the Public Order Act.’
Connolly’s X post was made just hours after killer Axel Rudakubana murdered three young girls and attempted to murder ten others at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class on July 29, 2024, sparking nationwide unrest.
It came amid speculation, which was later proved to be false, that the murders had been committed by an illegal immigrant.
She was arrested on August 6, by which point she had deleted her social media account.
But other messages which included other damning remarks were uncovered by officers who seized her phone.
The Southport atrocity sparked nationwide unrest, with several people – including Connolly – jailed as a result.
Her tweet was viewed 310,000 times in three-and-a-half hours before she deleted it.
She later pleaded guilty to distributing material with the intention of stirring up racial hatred at Birmingham Crown Court and was sentenced to 31 months in prison in October.
In May, she had an appeal against her sentence refused by three Court of Appeal judges at the Royal Courts of Justice.
Connolly argued she had been ‘really angry’ after the Southport attacks, but hours after posting the rant on X realised it was not an acceptable thing to say, so deleted it.
She also said that news of the Southport murders had triggered her anxiety from when her baby son, Harry, died as the result of a hospital blunder 13 years earlier.
At her appeal case, Adam King, representing Connolly, asked if she had intended for anyone to set fire to asylum hotels or ‘murder any politicians’. She replied: ‘Absolutely not.’
Naeem Valli, for the prosecution, told the court the post was a reflection of her attitude towards immigrants.
At the time Mr Connolly told of the pain of his wife’s long imprisonment, saying: ‘The 284 days of separation have been very hard, particularly on our 12-year-old girl.’
Connolly’s case later became international news, with US officials saying earlier this year they are keeping tabs on developments over their ‘concerns’ about free speech.
