Fears are mounting that Labour‘s moves to create an official definition of Islamophobia will have a ‘chilling effect’ on free speech.
The Tories have warned that introducing a government-backed definition will lead to a clampdown on freedom of expression.
Housing and local government spokesman Kevin Hollinrake also said the committee – made up almost entirely of Muslims – set up by Labour to devise the definition would lead to a ‘predetermined and biased’ conclusion.
And a cross-party group of peers has written to Labour’s working group, whose chairman is former Tory Dominic Grieve, expressing concerns.
They claim the move could lead to public sector workers, as well as university staff or students, facing disciplinary action if accused of doing or saying ‘something that falls foul of the definition’.
Mr Hollinrake asked Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner in the Commons yesterday: ‘Does the Secretary of State not share our concerns that their report and recommendations will be seen as predetermined and biased?’
He said ‘freedom of speech is on the line’ and expressed concerns about the definition being drawn up in secret by the Anti-Muslim Hate/Islamophobia Definition Working Group.
Ms Rayner accused Mr Hollinrake of using ‘incendiary language’, insisting: ‘We will always protect free speech, including the right to criticise religions.
Angela Rayner insisted the government would ‘always protect free speech, including the right to criticise religions’
Housing and local government spokesman Kevin Hollinrake said Labour’s moves to create an official definition of Islamophobia will have a ‘chilling effect’ on free speech
A cross-party group of peers has written to Labour’s working group, whose chairman is former Tory Dominic Grieve, expressing their concerns
‘The independent working group will submit its findings… We will then consider its recommendations and set out the next steps.’
Former Tory co-chairman Baroness Warsi also accused Mr Hollinrake of ‘unbefitting gutter politics’.
Labour commissioned the work to devise a ‘non-statutory’ definition of Islamophobia in a what it says is a move to combat anti-Muslim abuse.
But there are fears it could lead to a blasphemy law by the back door and stifle legitimate criticism of Islam.
More than 30 peers said in their letter: ‘Our principal concern is that if your working group comes up with a definition and it is taken up by the Government it will have a chilling effect on free speech and exacerbate community tensions.
‘It would have wide-ranging implications for what people in public life, and those who work for public bodies or attend schools or universities, are able to say about Muslims and Islam.
Former Tory co-chairman Baroness Warsi accused Mr Hollinrake of ‘unbefitting gutter politics’
‘This presumably would mean any member of a university that says or does something that falls foul of the definition would face potential penalties.’
The Policy Exchange think-tank has said Labour’s working group should be suspended, warning an official definition of Islamophobia would ‘almost certainly turbocharge cancel culture’.
After a review by Whitehall troubleshooter Baroness Casey found public bodies covered up evidence about Asian grooming gangs ‘for fear of appearing racist’, Policy Exchange said Labour’s measures ‘would have made exposing the grooming scandal even harder and slower’.
Ms Rayner’s department said ‘any proposed definition must be compatible with the right to freedom of speech and expression’.
