According to a peer-reviewed study published in Vaccines, mRNA COVID vaccines destroy 60% of female ovum supplies, which are non-renewable.
2/ The study titled, “Impact of mRNA and Inactivated COVID-19 Vaccines on Ovarian Reserve”, was published in the journal Vaccines, and reported on by @NicHulscher at @mcculloughfund and https://t.co/L48yIC4zPm
— Rod D. Martin (@RodDMartin) May 23, 2025
Granted, the studies were conducted in lab rats given human-equivalent doses of the vaccines, so the effects in human beings may be different, but this sure blows a hole in the claims that the COVID vaccines posed no risks to women’s fertility.
The claims made by all those “experts” were made with absolutely no scientific evidence to back them up, and the evidence to the contrary is now overwhelming.
Our findings suggest that both mRNA and inactivated COVID-19 vaccines may detrimentally impact ovarian reserve in rats, primarily through accelerated follicular loss and alterations in apoptotic pathways during folliculogenesis. Given these observations in a rat model, further investigations into the vaccines’ effects on human ovarian reserve are needed.
It has long been known that women who were administered the COVID-19 vaccines suffered from menstrual changes–this effect was noticed early on and is now well-established–so it shouldn’t be shocking that the vaccines had a detrimental impact on fertility itself.
Despite this fact, public health officials went on a campaign to reassure women that there was no danger at all to their fertility and that any suggestion that there might be was misinformation–misinformation that was, of course, censored for quite a while.
Oops.
Rats injected intramuscularly with a Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine — at a human-equivalent dose — experienced a >60% reduction in primordial follicles, the foundational egg supply for future fertility (p
The inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac) also caused loss, but to a lesser extent.
The primordial follicle pool is finite and non-regenerating — females are born with all the eggs they will ever have.
Destruction of this pool is irreversible, leading to permanent fertility loss if translated to humans.
AMH, a hormone reflecting ovarian reserve, dropped significantly in the mRNA group — both in serum and in ovarian tissue (p
Lower AMH is associated with poor fertility outcomes and earlier menopause.
Increased expression of caspase-3 (a cell-death enzyme) and inflammatory markers like TGF-β1 and VEGF were found in vaccinated rats.
These biomarkers are linked to ovarian atresia, fibrosis, and long-term tissue damage.
It can’t be repeated enough that the claims that the vaccine wouldn’t impact fertility were entirely unfounded by even the most cursory scientific study. No evidence at all.
Yet public health officials performed a full-court press to gaslight people into believing that they were “following the science,” even though no science had been done, nor could it have been in the short period of time between the creation of the vaccine and its wide-scale distribution.
Worse, since the mRNA vaccines were fundamentally different in kind from prior vaccines, it wasn’t even possible to extrapolate from prior experience to make a decent guess whether there was a danger. mRNA technology isn’t remotely similar to traditional vaccines.
If these findings indeed apply to humans, the implications for global fertility rates are profound. This kind of damage — to a woman’s lifelong egg supply — is biologically irreversible.
Unfortunately, a recent study by Manniche et al indicates that these ovarian reserve destruction findings likely DO translate to humans. Among ~1.3 million Czech women aged 18–39, those vaccinated against COVID-19 had ~33% fewer successful pregnancies compared to unvaccinated women:
While I doubt that any of the people pushing these vaccines knew that they would cause a loss in fertility–there was no data to go on or, as far as I know, a reason to predict that this would happen–we do have reason to believe that it wouldn’t be seen as a tragedy by many of them. They are, as a class, if not all individually, in favor of reducing the population. This may explain their indifference to the possibility.
Or it could just be groupthink and excessive zeal.
Whatever the case, almost no childbearing age women were at risk from COVID itself, so there was no urgency to get the vaccine out to this cohort. By any reasonable cost/benefit calculation, it was a terrible idea.
One could even say a crime against humanity.
