‘The Fact Checker’ by Austin Kelley is a clever caper

The unnamed narrator in Austin Kelley’s madcap mystery, “The Fact Checker,” is a man beleaguered by uncertainties. He man works on the staff of a magazine that is legendary for taking fact-checking to heroic and often obscure lengths. Kelley’s debut novel playfully jabs at two celebrated New York institutions: the New Yorker magazine’s storied fact-checking department and the city’s beloved farmers markets. 

By engaging with what the author calls “thickets of untruth,” this book could not be more timely. 

The novel is set in 2004. At the end of a long week of difficult calls to a CIA widow, Kelley’s hapless fact-checker is assigned to work on what he thinks will be an innocuous article about a popular Union Square market stall celebrated for its trendy heirloom tomatoes. Initially, he writes, “Nothing raised any red flags at all.”

Why We Wrote This

How far would you go to check a fact? For this novel’s narrator, no effort is too great to ascertain the truth, even if the work becomes a compulsion. And even if it drives the people around him nuts.

Readers will enjoy the narrator’s descriptions of his famously nitpicky job. His mandate is to confirm every fact, quote, date, and source in a story. To the consternation of poets, he even fact-checks their verses. “You check everything,” he says. “That’s the calling. You have to pick and poke at every little assertion from every angle. And you never know, when you are picking and poking, what will ooze and leave a stain.” He adds, “I badger people about details, sometimes irrelevant details.” 

That said, he’s proud to be “working on the side of truth,” and he enjoys becoming a mini-expert in a different subject every week. 

The downside is doubt, the constant feeling that he is missing something important. This unfortunately extends to his personal life, where he frequently misreads social cues. Paranoia ensues. “You might say I have ‘trust issues,’” he says. He’s good at picking things apart – perhaps too good. He abandoned his history dissertation on 19th-century utopias after meticulously showing why each idealist community failed. 

Source link

Related Posts

No Content Available