Exposed: The fantasy figures that mean Ed Miliband’s Net Zero dream will cost BILLIONS more than expected

The true cost of Ed Miliband’s drive to Net Zero is likely to run to billions more than official figures suggest, a report warns.

Government estimates are based on ‘fantasy assumptions’ and the real cost could exceed even the highest official predictions of £7.6trillion, according to the analysis.

The report comes as energy bills continue to increase despite Energy Secretary Ed Miliband’s election pledge to reduce them by £300.

Energy analyst David Turver, author of the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA) report, said: ‘The various public bodies responsible for working out the costs of Net Zero… have made fantasy assumptions about the cost of renewables and low-carbon technologies. The true cost of Net Zero is much higher than we have been led to believe.’

The IEA report looked at estimates from Government bodies including the Climate Change Committee (CCC) and National Energy System Operator (Neso).

The CCC claimed that achieving Net Zero between 2025 and 2050 will cost £108billion – down from earlier estimates of over £1trillion.

Mr Turver said that this was due to ‘implausibly low’ projections of the cost of renewables and borrowing rates, rather than falling costs.

The true cost of Ed Miliband’s drive to Net Zero is likely to run to billions more than official figures suggest, a report warns 

Mr Turver said that this was likely to be a 'considerable underestimate' given recent failures of offshore wind projects and rising costs (stock)

Mr Turver said that this was likely to be a ‘considerable underestimate’ given recent failures of offshore wind projects and rising costs (stock)

Mr Miliband is expected to outline proposals next month for grants worth £13billion for insulation, heat pumps, solar panels and home batteries as part of Labour's warm homes programme

Mr Miliband is expected to outline proposals next month for grants worth £13billion for insulation, heat pumps, solar panels and home batteries as part of Labour’s warm homes programme 

Neso, the body responsible for running Britain’s power networks, predicted that Net Zero would cost £7.6trillion.

But Mr Turver said that this was likely to be a ‘considerable underestimate’ given recent failures of offshore wind projects and rising costs.

He added: ‘If these costs were widely understood, public support for Net Zero would be at risk.’

Claire Coutinho, the shadow energy secretary, said: ‘It beggars belief that none of our ‘independent’ energy bodies can publish an accurate figure for what Net Zero is going to cost this country.

‘Wildly optimistic assumptions and crippling groupthink in our institutions means we’re flying blind – and the result is the highest electricity prices in the world and our industry fleeing overseas.’

Reform UK Deputy Leader Richard Tice said the report ‘shows the real cost of Net Zero will be many trillions of pounds, and will not reduce the cost of energy’.

Last week, official estimates of the cost of Net Zero from Neso put the price at £4.5trillion over the next 25 years.

Mr Miliband is expected to outline proposals next month for grants worth £13billion for insulation, heat pumps, solar panels and home batteries as part of Labour’s warm homes programme.

But Government data published this month showed that electricity generation from fossil fuels rose last year.

A spokesman for the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero said: ‘We reject this analysis, which assumes there are no costs associated with staying on the fossil fuel rollercoaster.

‘The only way to bring down energy bills and deliver energy security is by making Britain a clean energy superpower.’

Sums that just don’t add up

The report identifies repeated examples of official bodies underestimating the cost of renewables and overstating that of gas. These predictions from Government agencies such as the National Energy System Operator (Neso) and Climate Change Committee (CCC) distort the real cost of Net Zero, the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA) says. Its findings include:

– NESO’s cost of offshore wind in 2025 is underestimated at £70.10/MWh. Contracts have been awarded to wind farms at £85/MWh and the next round of auctions goes up to £118/MWh.

– NESO says floating offshore wind is predicted to be £109/MWh in 2035, despite contracts being awarded at £202/MWh and the next round of auctions going up to £282/MWh.

– OFFSHORE wind farm Hornsea 3, which is expected to come online by 2028, is forecast to cost between £10-£11billion – more than double the CCC’s estimate.

– NESO prices solar power at £31/MWh in 2035, though contracts have been awarded at £72/MWh and prices could rise to £78/MWh in the next auction round.

– The CCC predicted that solar power plants would cost £564/kW, but the recently delivered solar farms of Stokeford and Alfreton spent £952/kW and £995/kW, respectively – nearly double the estimate.

– NESO assumes gas-fired generation is more expensive than it is likely to be, estimating carbon costs at £78.70 per tonne in 2025. But they were £30 per tonne in January last year and only rose to around £60 per tonne after the Government announced we would align with the EU emissions trading system.

Source link

Related Posts

Load More Posts Loading...No More Posts.