I have written a number of times about the connection between leftist politics, alphabet ideology, and the movement to break down the taboos surrounding adult/child sexual relations.
Many of my normie center-left friends think that any discussions of this topic are driven by weird Q-Anon theories and bear no relationship to reality. No matter the evidence, the idea that so-called “respectable” people and academic experts, or even politicians, would want to legalize and promote children and adults having sex is too horrific to imagine.
So they refuse to. When the left insists that it is all a myth, and even go to great lengths to suppress any discussion of the issue, they nod along and mumble about conspiracy theories and right-wing propaganda.
This might be the most disturbing paper I have ever read, perhaps even edging out a recent paper about “Queering Babies” that explicitly sexualized infants. These people are sick.
Read my write-up below. https://t.co/1Xwm1lpGhh
— Colin Wright (@SwipeWright) September 24, 2025
The authors lament that most scholarship “marginalizes childhood sexual pleasure” and views children as “vulnerable subjects.” They argue that we must “interrogate dominant narratives of sexual innocence that suppress young people’s desires” and instead recognize how children “negotiate pleasure and meaning amid intersecting hierarchies of age, race, gender, and class.” They reject what they call “adult-centric/adultist approaches to sexualities” and insist that “childhood pleasure is indispensable for an inclusive sociology and just sexual futures.”
It is hard to read this as anything other than laying the intellectual groundwork for dismantling age-of-consent protections.
The central theme of the paper is “pleasure.” This aligns with trends in international sex education policy, particularly the International Planned Parenthood Federation’s Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE) program, which explicitly shifted away from sex education centered around reproduction and toward what it calls “sexual expression, sexual fulfillment, and pleasure.” Pleasure is one of seven core elements of CSE. Its Youth Policy, applying to “all young people irrespective of their age,” declares a “right to pleasure” and “the right of all young people to enjoy sex and express their sexuality in the way that they choose.”
It is therefore no surprise that the paper’s authors frame the very notion of childhood sexual innocence as a barrier to progress.
They are saddened that “preadolescent children’s erotic capacities are routinely pathologized.” They argue that the “notion of childhood sexual innocence” is a harmful social construct that wrongly portrays children as “vulnerable to and in need of protection from sexuality.” In their telling, “operating from the presumption of innate (sexual) innocence” leads scholars and the public to “overlook children’s everyday pleasures” and attempt to “banish childhood sexuality altogether.” They even go so far as to describe childhood sexual innocence as a “colonial fiction.”
The fact that such arguments now appear in a flagship journal of the American Sociological Association should alarm everyone. As we repeatedly see, what begins as abstract theorizing in niche corners of academia rarely stays there. It trickles down into education, policy, and culture.
As a psychological phenomenon, it is fascinating; as a political reality, it is infuriating. Even when they know beyond doubt that our K-12 system is saturated with sexual propaganda aimed at children, they interpret that reality as merely a desire to teach kindness. As Planned Parenthood pushes an agenda of child sexual experimentation, they see only prudent discussions about preventing teen pregnancy.
They see these things because that is what they want to see. The alternative is too horrible to contemplate.
That’s why Pravda Media went into overdrive, attacking the movie Sound of Freedom. The true story behind it must be a lie, right? Hundreds of stories promoted the idea that it was all right-wing fantasy, because the alternative was to see the likelihood that a portion of the 300,000 unaccompanied migrant minors the Biden administration lost were part of a child trafficking right, and the Biden administration knew it.
The thing is…the “Minor Atrracted Community” is not hiding their agenda. They openly discuss it, and even publish peer-reviewed papers in journals, are pushing the idea that the taboo behind banning paedophila is a Western colonialist oppressive concept.
As with most bad things in our modern society, Critical Theory is in the background of this movement.
Go online and you can find plenty of sites dedicated to discussion adult/child s@xual relations, and you can even buy merchandise to be loud and proud.
The trans activist movement–heck, the entire alphabet movement–is backing laws that explicitly sexualize children and doing its best to normalize it. Going as far back as the original sexual studies done by John Money and Alfred Kinsey, the sexuality of children was a key focus of research. Kinsey spent a lot of time interviewing jailed paedos and wrote about infants having orgasms, and is now revered for his research. There is a Kinsey Institute at the University of Indiana.
Liberating sexuality and focusing particularly on pleasure, not procreation, is vital to the movement because sexual taboos are integral to any society. Liberate people from social restraints, and the social structures behind family and religion collapse. That is the goal of the “Queer” movement.
It is no coincidence that you can find hundreds of stories of alphabet activists being caught with CSE materials (Child Sexual Exploitation), or even of Queer activists who have adopted children abusing them, or even trafficking them.
In light of pride month, let’s not forget about these two evil monsters. They adopted two boys and basically used them as sex slaves. Creating videos of them molesting the little boys, and also allowing other men to sexually abuse them.
Both of these kids life’s have been… pic.twitter.com/VJ8wR0TfN7
— Constitutional Gator (@WeThePeople021) June 11, 2023
Yet good liberals work tirelessly to ensure that adoption is easy for such people, and celebrate when it happens. Not because they want the children to be exploited, but because they want to comfort themselves into believing that Queers are just normal people whose sexual or gender preferences are slightly different.
It is generally true that most homosexuals are not MAPs, and more than a few are Pete Buttigiegs and not monsters at all. In fact, a lot of gays are revolted by these freaks and actively and loudly reject the idea that they are part of the gay community.
Good for them! With that said, given that homosexual men are 10-11 times more likely to abuse children than straight men, it seems prudent to have policies that give substantial priority to married heterosexual couples over gays, especially gay men.
Sorry, guys, it’s not personal. I don’t think being gay makes you a sexual predator, but the reality is that the two are correlated. The vast majority of gays and straights are not paedos, of course. It’s just that a disproportionate number of paedos are gay. With that said, due to the size of the two populations, the majority of sex offenders are still heterosexual. (Did I cover my rear with all that? Probably not.)
All the controversies surrounding transgender access to bathrooms, locker rooms, spas, and sports are driven by people who would rather deny reality than acknowledge that they are supporting sex offenders invading vulnerable women’s spaces. They speak of “kindness” and tolerance, and casually put women into prisons with literal sex offenders who are male.
What could go wrong with allowing men into women’s locker rooms and restrooms??!!
THIS💥👀👇🏼 https://t.co/bZ2alt4Zn5
— Spitfire (@DogRightGirl) September 25, 2025
Just to feel good about themselves. At some level, they must worry that they are on the wrong side of the issue, and once this fever breaks will sadly acknowledge that they made a mistake or two (see: COVID), but insist that they did it out of love.
Yeah, whatever. You are on the side of the paedos and rapists right now. At some point, the “kindness” argument wears so thin it is transparent.
-
Editor’s Note: The mainstream media continues to deflect, gaslight, spin, and lie about President Trump, his administration, and conservatives.
Help us continue to expose their left-wing bias by reading news you can trust. Join Hot Air VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.
