A meeting at the White House Friday holds the prospect of ending the cycle of wars that has rocked Azerbaijan and Armenia for more than 30 years.
Optimists hope that the two countries’ leaders will finally sign a long-prepared peace treaty while at the White House. Most experts, though, expect the meeting will produce instead a memorandum of understanding, with the two leaders signing the treaty only after thorny details have been worked out.
In either case, President Donald Trump will get to play the role of peacemaker.
Why We Wrote This
The leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan are visiting the White House in hopes of a peace deal. As power in the region shifts, the Trump administration offers a balanced approach both sides want to trust.
Though Washington has played a minimal part in framing the settlement, Mr. Trump’s role is nonetheless potentially more than symbolic. A geopolitical earthquake is shaking the South Caucasus region. Russian influence has been fading for years, as evidenced by its recent inability to help Armenia, its ally, stave off a humiliating military defeat by Azerbaijan. Armenia is now looking westward for new sponsors.
Azeri analysts say they’re happy with Mr. Trump’s efforts to facilitate the peace process, as well.
“This U.S. administration is equidistant, where the former Biden administration was clearly pro-Armenia,” says Ilgar Velizade, head of an association of political scientists in Baku, the capital of Azerbaijan. “But it’s a bilateral process between Azerbaijan and Armenia, and it’s important the two sides find agreement themselves.”
“We see Trump acting as a pragmatic guide who is helping Armenia to navigate itself into a new regional configuration,” he says.
The new regional order is being shaped largely by Turkey and its ally, Azerbaijan. The most potent symbol is the Zangezur Corridor, a project that would build a transport passage through Armenian territory to Azerbaijan’s ethnic exclave, Nakhchivan. The plan could expand Turkey’s scope for regional influence significantly, providing a direct connection between Turkey, the Caspian Sea, and all the Turkic-speaking regions of former Soviet Central Asia beyond.
Azerbaijan insists the Zangezur Corridor must not be under Armenian control. Reports suggest the U.S. is considering taking over management of the sensitive project.
“This will be much more than just a peace that ends the conflict, as welcome as that would be,” says Sergei Melkonian, an expert with the Applied Policy Research Institute in Yerevan, the Armenian capital. “This settlement will reshape the entire regional order.”
Peace has long remained elusive in the region, despite frequent efforts by Russia, France, and the U.S. – often referred to as the Minsk Group. Five years ago, Azerbaijan launched a major military offensive, which drove Armenian forces out of Azeri territory they had long occupied. Then two years ago, Azerbaijan pushed aside Russian peacekeepers and occupied Nagorno-Karabakh – an Armenian enclave in Azerbaijan – forcing its population of about 120,000 to flee.
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan appears to have accepted defeat and conceded the loss of Nagorno-Karabakh and a few smaller traditionally Armenian territories. His hope is that a Western-backed peace settlement might provide his country – blockaded by Turkey and Azerbaijan since 1993 – with security guarantees and opportunities to integrate with a wider world.
Two Azeri demands have held up efforts to finalize the peace:
- Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev has insisted that Armenia amend its constitution to remove all references to Nagorno-Karabakh as an Armenian entity. While Mr. Pashinyan has signaled willingness to work toward that goal, he has encountered a storm of public opposition.
- Armenia has been reluctant to abolish the Minsk Group, which has monitored the conflict for decades, although it appears Mr. Pashinyan might be prepared to yield on that issue as well.
The Zangezur Corridor is a third, potentially deal-stopping issue. Despite other options, Azerbaijan insists that it cut through Armenian territory, without any oversight by Armenian border guards or customs officers. Putting it under the control of a private U.S. company would inflame Russia and neighboring Iran, and underscore Armenia’s powerlessness.
A peace treaty that leaves the corridor to future negotiations is possible, say analysts. But some Armenians say they wish things weren’t moving so quickly.
“The main thing is that Armenia’s prime minister is ready to give up part of Armenia’s territory for the sake of rapprochement with the West,” says Alexander Iskandaryan, director of the Caucasus Institute in Yerevan. “Trump will take credit for the solution of all the problems. It’s a PR action for him. But we are left with many unresolved issues that cannot be settled quickly.”