Wednesday, June 18, 2025

New York City May Elect an Unhinged Socialist as Mayor – HotAir

June 18, 2025
0Points
10
New York City Faces the Threat of an Antisemitic Mayor – HotAir
0
Shares

Yes, yes. I know “unhinged” and “socialist” go together like peas and carrots, but it is a headline. 

Now, on to the story. 

New York City does elections the new-fangled way, using ranked-choice voting to ensure that the outcomes take forever to tally, the results tend to lean left, and voters are maximally confused. 





That makes predicting outcomes particularly difficult, although you can balance the difficulty by assuming that the worst outcome possible is the most likely. Throw in the fact that a plurality of New York City voters will reliably make the wrong choice when it comes to electing people, and suddenly it should surprise nobody that a socialist candidate has a very good chance to live at Gracie Mansion soon. 

Yes, Zohran Mamdani is rising in the polls, after weeks of being substantially behind Andrew Cuomo in the polls. 

This is Zohran Mamdani.

State Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani represents part of Queens and recently earned the endorsement of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in the race. The democratic socialist built a campaign based on lowering the cost of living, including a rent freeze on stabilized units. 

A May 2025 Emerson College poll of Democratic candidates placed him second with 23% behind Cuomo at 35%, and he told Kramer he believes a significant get-out-the-vote effort could be consequential. If there’s a candidate who appears most likely to potentially defeat Cuomo in the primary, Mamdani may be it. 

In our March interview, Kramer asked him about Mayor Adams’ corruption scandal and turnover in his administration, what he thinks about Cuomo and Speaker Adams joining the race, and how he would fund his plans for free buses and universal free child care. He also spoke about fighting federal funding cuts, his push to get younger voters to the polls, raising the corporate tax rate, bipartisan politics and what brings him hope. 





If you had asked people a few weeks ago who would win, the near-consensus would have been former governor Andrew Cuomo. Despite his many, many flaws, he seemed to be the most rational of the large bunch of candidates who will be on the ballot, at least on the Democratic side of the aisle. 

Now he seems like he could be a loser, because he is the most rational candidate on the ballot for the top Democratic slot in the primary. New Yorkers, you know. The city that gave us AOC. 

The New York Times, a once-great newspaper, is so worried that Mamdani is rising in the polls that they united in an editorial taking him on. 

“Unfortunately, Mr. Mamdani is running on an agenda uniquely unsuited to the city’s challenges. He is a democratic socialist who too often ignores the unavoidable trade-offs of governance. He favors rent freezes that could restrict housing supply and make it harder for younger New Yorkers and new arrivals to afford housing. He wants the government to operate grocery stores, as if customer service and retail sales were strengths of the public sector. He minimizes the importance of policing.”

“Most worrisome, he shows little concern about the disorder of the past decade, even though its costs have fallen hardest on the city’s working-class and poor residents. Mr. Mamdani, who has called Mr. de Blasio the best New York mayor of his lifetime, offers an agenda that remains alluring among elite progressives but has proved damaging to city life.”  

“Mr. Mamdani would also bring less relevant experience than perhaps any mayor in New York history. He has never run a government department or private organization of any size. As a state legislator, he has struggled to execute his own agenda.”  

“We do not believe that Mr. Mamdani deserves a spot on New Yorkers’ ballots.”





One of the main issues driving his rise is the anti-ICE passion on the left, and the appetite for Marxist solutions to socialist-caused problems. As always, the solution to too much government is even more. 

Candidates in New York are competing for the illegal immigrant vote now, with fellow candidate Brad Lander–who is cooperating with Mamdani in the ranked-choice voting scheme–getting himself arrested in order to get attention. He interfered with ICE when they were arresting an illegal immigrant. 

Mamdani is a radical–he wants rent freezes, government-run grocery stores, supports Hamas, and probably kicks puppies (I made up that last one). 

Ranked choice voting may save Cuomo, even though it usually elevates the more extreme candidates. Because there are so many extremists, Cuomo may squeak through. The Manhattan Institute argues he likely will:





The decisive question is, as always, who is most motivated to vote. Is it the anti-crime voters, or the activists among the young and dumb? If the former, it will be Cuomo; if it is the latter, Mamdani may be on his way to a showdown later this year. Adams will pick up the anti-crime vote, Mamdani the pro-destruction vote. 

Adams is a wounded candidate, though, and he almost certainly would lose to Cuomo, and things don’t look so good even against Mamdani. 





I’m done, for the moment, making predictions. Predicting is hard, especially about the future. 

But the rise of Mamdani is a good reminder that there is a substantial number of truly insane people in our country, and that they are concentrated in Blue cities. 







Source link

Related Posts

Load More Posts Loading...No More Posts.

TRENDING

© 2025 americanpolibeat -